EV Emission Analysis
I discovered a wealth of energy and pollution info on various California
state agency web sites, particularly CARB and CEC. So I computed my own
figures for per-mile power plant emissions for EVs.
Gasoline/Diesel Emissions
From http://www.energy.ca.gov/fuels/gasoline/gasolinesales.html
I see that the total taxable motor fuels (gasoline & diesel) sold in
CA in 1996 was 15,791,759,000 gallons.
And from
http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/stats/table49.html
I see that the CA average fuel economy in 1993 (latest year available)
was 17.7 miles/gallon.
17.7 mpg * 15,791,759,000 gallons = 279.5e9 miles driven per year. That's
765.8 million miles/day, a figure I wasn't able to find directly. From
http://www.arb.ca.gov/ceidars/emssumcat.query?F_DIV=0&F_YR=1995&F_AREA=CA"
we see that the total pollutants from all that gasoline burned and on-road
miles driven are (1995 figures)
| Pollutant |
Tons/day |
grams/mile |
| Total organic gases |
1800 |
2.1323 |
| Reactive organic gases |
1600 |
1.895 |
| Carbon monoxide |
15000 |
17.77 |
| Nitrogen oxides |
2100 |
2.488 |
| Sulfur oxides |
56 |
0.06634 |
| Particulates |
80 |
0.09477 |
| Particulates < 10 micron |
67 |
0.07937 |
("1 ton" = 2000 pounds, not 1000 kg)
Electric Generation Emissions
Now let's look at the situation for electricity. From
http://www.energy.ca.gov/electricity/electricitygen.html
I get an in-state annual electricity generation from all sources of 202,022
GW-hr, which works out to 553.44 GW-hr/day or an average of 23.06GW, which
seems about right. From the emissions inventory page mentioned earlier,
we can see that in 1995 in-state electric generation produced
| Pollutant |
Tons/day |
grams/kW-hr |
| Total organic gases |
28 |
0.0459 |
| Reactive organic gases |
6 |
0.009835 |
| Carbon monoxide |
36 |
0.059 |
| Nitrogen oxides |
69 |
0.1131 |
| Sulfur oxides |
8 |
0.0131 |
| Total particulates |
6 |
0.00983 |
| Particulates < 10 microns |
5 |
0.00819 |
So if we use that electricity to charge EVs getting 4 miles/kW-hr,
the electric generation emissions attributable to each EV mile driven would
be
| Pollutant |
grams/mile |
% of internal combustion |
| Total organic gases |
0.011475 |
0.5% |
| Reactive organic gases |
0.002459 |
0.13% |
| Carbon monoxide |
0.01475 |
0.083% |
| Nitrogen oxides |
0.028275 |
1.136% |
| Sulfur oxides |
0.003275 |
4.9% |
| Total particulates |
0.0024575 |
2.59% |
| Particulates < 10 microns |
0.0020475 |
2.578% |
Obviously it depends on the specific pollutant, but this all is pretty
consistent with the 97% reduction figure I've heard for some time (power
plant emissions per EV mile being 97% less than the per-mile emissions
for an average gasoline or diesel vehicle). And those emissions are at
the power plants, not in downtown LA or SD or wherever the cars are.
Caveats
I wasn't able to find all my statistics from the same year.
The electric generation figures are probably gross totals, so they don't
include transmission losses (I think I've seen 20%).
I assume the current electric generation mix would apply to large numbers
of EVs. This may or may not be true, depending on how much capacity is
available from which kinds of plants when the EVs are charged. If
all of the miles driven in California could be electrically powered
at 4 miles/kW-hr, that would work out to an average electrical load of
about 8GW, which is about 35% of the average in-state electric generation
of 23.06GW. About three and a half San Onofres (@2.2 GW each) would do
it (just had to say it :-))
Most of the petroleum fuels go to cars and trucks, but the total taxed
fuel sales figures might include other users (aviation, trains); depending
on how polluting these users are, and how much they use, it could affect
the figures either way.
My EV "mileage" of 4 miles/kW-hr, referenced to the AC socket, is for the
EV1, and may be optimistic for larger EVs -- though given the number of
cars you see on the freeway with exactly one occupant, it's clear that
a lot of people could commute in the EV1.
Despite these caveats, it's pretty clear that EVs have the advantage
when it comes to air pollution.
Phil Karn, January 1999